Two
weeks ago, I visited the Deaf community in South St. Elizabeth for the second
time to conduct some linguistic research. I was there for two days. And what an
experience it was!Monday, 13 October 2014
Lessons Learnt from St. Elizabeth
Two
weeks ago, I visited the Deaf community in South St. Elizabeth for the second
time to conduct some linguistic research. I was there for two days. And what an
experience it was!What's in a Name?! Quite A Lot, Actually!
And More Names
Sign Language Names
Sign Language Names in St. Elizabeth
- the
older members of the community have two name signs - one in CSL and the in
Jamaican Sign Language (JSL)
- name
signs in CS are 100% descriptive
- when
you ask a Country Signer her/his name sign, s/he is most likely to give you
her/his JSL sign name
- the
name signs in JSL *appear to involve only a hand forming a letter of the
alphabet and placed somewhere on the body
Tuesday, 26 April 2011
Fi Wi Chatn Fi Wi Raitn - Reading and Writing Jamaican
English to Jamaican Transition Primer_Selected Portions
Monday, 25 April 2011
Jamaican (Patwa) Debate AGAIN!
- Undeveloped Conscience and Real Sin
- Argue Logically for Patois
- Patois is the Best Route to English
- Teaching Patois Undermines Poor
- Teach English as Foreign Language
- How Would the Patois Policy Work?
- UNESCO Guidelines and Jamaican Patois
- Fait a Yaad, Daans Abraad
- Defending Patois
- A Waste of Time to Teach Patois - Seaga
- Teaching Patois Adds to Problem
- Online Feedback
- Policy Makers Must Be Informed About Patois
- The Discrimination Debate
- Harding Warns Against Discrimination Based on Language, Sexual Orientation
- Charter of Rights - A Recipe for Discrimination
- What About Freedom from Language Discrimination
- Guarantee Freedom from Language Discrimination
- The Right to Discriminate
- Nicholson Doubts Ja Will Resume Capital Punishment
- Charter of Rights (and Wrongs)
- Is Jamaican Patois Inherently Vulgar and Base
- Abbot, Patois Bible and Language Discrimination
- The Patois Industry, Rastamouse and Sandals Brand
- Don't Knock Rastamouse
- Teaching Patois in Schools Is Not Wrong
- Encourage English, Not Patois
- Cherish J'can Dialect, but Please No Patois Bible
- Creole Advocates Sign Language Charter
- Nationalise Caribbean Creole - Regional Officials
The Charter of Rights Maintains Linguistic Discrimination
On 22 March, the House of Representatives passed the Charter of Rights and sent it to the Senate. If passed by the Senate, the Charter would result in an amendment of the Jamaican constitution by replacing Chapter III of the current Constitution. According to Luton, "The Charter of Rights places on the State an obligation to promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and freedoms for all persons in Jamaica and affords protection to the rights and freedoms of persons as set out in those provisions." Amongst other things, the Charter protects Jamaicans from being discriminated against on ground of gender, race, place of origin, social class, colour, religion and political opinions (Devonish, 02; cf Gleaner commentary, 5 April, 11).
No provision was made for protecting the 95% of the Jamaican population who has Jamaican as their first language against discrimination on the ground of language. This is so, even though the government had given the University of the West Indies (UWI) the opportunity do the research necessary to having an informed discussion/decision on the proposed provision. The UWI through the Jamaican Language Unit (JLU) seized the opportunity and conducted the necessary research. This included organising and implementing the Bilingual Education Project, a pilot project which sought to determine “the most effective means of encouraging full bilingualism for primary level students at the Grades 1 – 4 in Jamaican (Jamaican Creole) (JC) and Standard Jamaican English (SJE)” (BEP webpage). Unfortunately, the Charter has been passed by the House of Representative without giving consideration to the JLU’s research and its findings.
1. Luton, Dariane (23 March, 11) Parliament Passes Charter of Rights Jamaica Gleaner
2. Devonish, Hubert (13 Jan 02) Language rights, justice and constitution Jamaica Gleaner
3. BEP Webpage http://www.mona.uwi.edu/dllp/jlu/projects/index.htm
Thursday, 22 July 2010
Wednesday, 21 July 2010
What Means the Most to Me
It’ not being given each order known
It’s not a sculpture of one’s own
- that means the most to me
“It’s not being spoken highly of
It’s not being known as capable of
It’s not being seen as worth of
– that means the most to me
“It’s not the world to call my own
It’s not a house to call sweet home
It’s not a car to drive around
– that means the most to me
“It’s those little things you do
Your hug, your kiss, your smile, your stew
Your touch, your time, your play time too
– that means the most to me”
By Bertram Gayle
Tuesday, 20 July 2010
My Experience with Relevance Theory: A Poem
A ron op dem mout, bout mi no nuo wat
A paahn mi gud edikieshan, dehn wahn pu dehn fut
A fala wahn man we dehn kaal Gut
Rik, Maagarit an di wan Hariyat
No tap pesa mi main bout wa Relavant
I wan Maatin, we dehn kaal Shuoda
I uol a dem a fala di uman Diyaajra
Prossesing effort, cognative benefits
Ef dem gwaan chat so, mi a go lef ya wid fits
Satisfying expecations of relevance
Pupa Gad dis neeva mi ekspektans
Wooi mi ed, Laad mi kanfuuz
A wa dem big wod Diyaajra a yuuz
Ostensive-inferential, a wa dat, Jiiz
Contextual implication, dikshineri pliiz
Bot Laad, mi naa gu bak Jumieka
Wid i siem andastandin mi kya kum uova ya
Mi wahn yu fi elp mi fi andastan Onga
Ahn yu don nuo aredi, bout di wan we niem Sporba!
Laad, yu gud, iih?! Mi a get sopn
Aal dem big wod, no kom iin laik notn
Tenk yu fi ansa, preya -wat a sitn
Nou me a gu uom wid mi main ful a sitn
Thursday, 26 November 2009
When Will the Government Hear?
Recently, and out of interest, I visited the website for Jamaica Association for the Deaf (JAD), a government based organisation. I visited their schools page and I was most facinated by what I read under “Programmes and Curriculum.” It reads:
“Instruction is delivered in academic and vocational subjects and the curriculum pursued is based on the Ministry of Education's guidelines/curriculum with additional components to address language and speech development, these being the areas most affected by deafness. A special feature of our programme is the current thrust for a multilingual approach to instruction. The approach embodies the use of both Jamaican Sign Language and English in communication with students allowing the student to utilize the communication mode most comfortable to him/her. Research efforts are further seeking to develop a clearer understanding of the structure and usage of Jamaican Sign Language by the Deaf population as a means of aiding their development of English as a second language” (emphasis mine).
It is my conviction that the Ministry of Education, Youth and Culture (MOEYC) is blameworthy of double standard here! How so? The Ministry allows for full implementation of Jamaican Sign Languag (JSL) in deaf education - from pre-school to continuining education - whilst, at the same time, it practically disregard to the use of Jamaican Ceole (JamC) in the education of the hearing population, even at the primary level. True, societal attitudes toward JamC are (???) more negative than those toward JSL (I’m not certain as to the veracity of this claim as I have no corroborating evidence, save my limited experience). And we are all aware that the status of a speech variety has much to do with its use in both informal and formal domains. The MOEYC acknowledges the problem of societal attitudes in its Language Education Policy where it states its decision to adopt “transitional bilingualism.” Besides financial and orthographic constraints, states the ministry, transitional bilingualism was favoured above full bilingualism (its ideal choice) because of “political and social attitudes to Creole as a medium of instruction.” It goes on to say that these social attitudes “could present obstacles that are difficult to overcome” (MOEYC, 2001:24). My opinion: the government hasn’t yet got (there’s hope here!) the backbone to do what’s in the best interest of the majority of the nation’s aural/oral population.
Thursday, 10 September 2009
Language Use & Sin
Recently, I sent out a ministry update to persons on my mailing list. One of the things I said in my news is, "Most recently, I've been reflecting on the extent to which language use bears witness to humanity's constant problem – sin." Unsurprisingly, someone responded, expressing an interest in my reflections. Now, I'm not entirely sure the respondent understood precisely what I was referring to, so, I sought to clarify what exactly my reflections relate to, by writing the following:
"In terms of my reference to languages bearing witness to humanity's constant problem, sin, I had in mind issues such as 1) the deliberate marginalisation (social, educational, legal, financial, political, etc) of persons of "minority" language varieties and 2) the fact that (some) language policies and language planning measures reflect broader/deeper societal problems both on the macro and micro levels, eg. hatred of another race, or territory, or speech community due to unsavoury historical relations, political interests, etc. I'm of the opinion that many of these things could be considered a violation of one of the greatest commandments: "Love your neighbour as yourself" (Matt 22:39). So, what factors contribute to Hindi and Urdu being recognised as discrete languages both popularly and in the law, even though they may be identical at the level of grammar?
I'm particularly interested in finding out how BT agencies have dealt with these issues (particularly 2) over the years. For, in some cases, deciding to translate into a speech variety attracts various societal attitudes and could suggest the translation agency is supporting not only the language but all it represents to its speakers (and non speakers!).
I'm yet to refine my thoughts on the issue.... Do let me know what you think and of any material on the subject...."
Tuesday, 25 August 2009
Back to Blogging SOON
Thursday, 23 July 2009
Tuesday, 23 June 2009
Friday, 12 June 2009
Wednesday, 3 June 2009
Monday, 1 June 2009
Thursday, 28 May 2009
Project Summary Report
Early 2008, I was sent to the United Kingdom to take two courses - one on meaning and communication, the other on translation - with SIL, UK.
Later on in the year (from 4th -18th August), BSWI hosted a two week Translation Workshop. Of the eight persons who attended the workshop, three – Lloyd Millen, Tasheney Francis and Jodianne Scott - were selected as full-time translators of the Jamaican Creole Translation Project (JCTP) on a three-month probationary basis. All three successfully completed their probation and have been welcomed to the staff of BSWI.
Translation:
Translation proper begun 1st September, 2008 and, since then, the following has been achieved:
1) formulation of a document outlining the Project’s Translation Principles and Procedures
2) a tentative translation of “fixed” New Testament terms and a tentative transliteration of all NT names
3) production of first drafts for 14 epistles - Ephesians, 1-2 Thessalonians, 1-2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon, James, 1-2 Peter, 1-3 John and Jude - several of which have already gone through stage two (group review)
4) enlisting of two scholars to serve as Project exegetes – Rev’d Dr Carlton Dennis and Rev’d Dr Gosnell Yorke
5) attending consultancy sessions with our Translation Consultant, Dr Ronold Ross.
6) production of a second draft for Luke (see below)
7) the running of focus groups for Luke in six locations islandwide.
The Luuk Buk Project:
Before the current translation team was in place, BSWI had already embarked on the Luuk Buk Project.
Late 2008, the first draft of Luuk was reviewed for language specific issues and tested for comprehension by the Jamaican Language Unit of the University of the West Indies, Mona (JLU-UWI). The text was found to be unsatisfactory and, hence, unfit for studio production. Consequently, the current Translation Team was asked to incorporate the Luuk Buk Project into their workload. The first draft was reviewed by the Team and a second draft has been produced. This draft and the tentative translation of fixed New Testament terms are due to undergo comprehension testing in June of this year.
It is hoped that the improved text will be presented to the personnel in charge of studio production, by 30th June; and that the project will be launched this coming autumn – first in the United Kingdom, and then, in Jamaica.
Public Awareness:
One of the recommendations which came out of the 2008 breakfast for clergy (as well as from the series of focus groups hosted by JLU-UWI) is the need for BSWI to implement an effective public awareness strategy – to inform the public of issues pertaining to language, Bible translation and Scripture Use. It is believed that such a strategy would increase the level of acceptability of the Scriptures in Jamaican Creole, as it would address popular concerns and misunderstandings persons have expressed in relation to the project.
Recently, Jo-Ann Richards, former ethnomusicologist with SIL / Wycliffe Bible Translators, Caribbean, approached BSWI and expressed her desire to work on this aspect of the Project. Miss Richards attended a meeting at BSWI in March to discuss the matter and it was agreed that there should be a one-month probation period, during which time, Miss Richards would visit several schools and churches and use that experience to guide the development and implementation of an effective strategy.
Plans for this Quarter (April - June):
1. Produce a second draft of all translated books and submit to reviewers (exegetes, JLU-UWI, consultant) for review.
2. Launch a website for the project.

